Which statement best describes an Interpol Red Notice?

Which statement best describes an Interpol Red Notice?

• A. It is an international arrest warrant
• B. It seeks the arrest or provisional arrest of wanted persons with a view to extradition. Not an international arrest warrant, it is a notice to arrest someone for a warrant that exists in a separate national jurisdiction.
• C. It is a request to issue travel advisory
• D. It serves as a warrant for immediate seizure of property

Answer: (B)

A Red Notice is essentially an international request among Interpol member countries to locate and provisionally arrest a person who is wanted for prosecution or extradition in the issuing country. It is based on a valid national arrest warrant or extradition request, and Interpol itself does not issue an arrest warrant that binds all countries. Instead, it signals to local authorities worldwide to detain the person if found, with the intention of handing them over through extradition procedures. This is why the description that best fits is a request to arrest or provisional arrest with a view to extradition, clarifying that it is not an international arrest warrant and that the underlying warrant exists in a separate national jurisdiction. It’s not about travel advisories or immediate seizure of property.

A Red Notice is essentially an international request among Interpol member countries to locate and provisionally arrest a person who is wanted for prosecution or extradition in the issuing country. It is based on a valid national arrest warrant or extradition request, and Interpol itself does not issue an arrest warrant that binds all countries. Instead, it signals to local authorities worldwide to detain the person if found, with the intention of handing them over through extradition procedures. This is why the description that best fits is a request to arrest or provisional arrest with a view to extradition, clarifying that it is not an international arrest warrant and that the underlying warrant exists in a separate national jurisdiction. It’s not about travel advisories or immediate seizure of property.