Which writ is used to preserve the named property pending the outcome of the litigation?

Which writ is used to preserve the named property pending the outcome of the litigation?

• A. Juror Summons
• B. Writ of Execution
• C. Writ of Attachment
• D. Writ of Sequestration

Answer: (D)

Preserving the property under dispute during litigation is achieved through a writ that directs officials to seize and hold the specified assets, keeping them intact until the case is resolved. This sequestration places the named property under court protection so it cannot be sold, destroyed, or diverted while the litigation proceeds. The goal is to maintain the status quo and ensure that the property remains available to satisfy a future judgment if one is entered. The other options serve different purposes: an attachment secures property to satisfy a potential judgment, a writ of execution enforces a judgment after one is entered, and a juror summons has no relation to preserving property in litigation.

Preserving the property under dispute during litigation is achieved through a writ that directs officials to seize and hold the specified assets, keeping them intact until the case is resolved. This sequestration places the named property under court protection so it cannot be sold, destroyed, or diverted while the litigation proceeds. The goal is to maintain the status quo and ensure that the property remains available to satisfy a future judgment if one is entered. The other options serve different purposes: an attachment secures property to satisfy a potential judgment, a writ of execution enforces a judgment after one is entered, and a juror summons has no relation to preserving property in litigation.